DIVERCITIES

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Case Studies
    • Antwerp
    • Athens
    • Budapest
    • Copenhagen
    • Istanbul
    • Leipzig
    • London
    • Milan
    • Paris
    • Rotterdam
    • Tallinn
    • Toronto
    • Warsaw
    • Zurich
  • Conference
    • Conference Home
    • Conference Programme
    • Diversity Mini-Festival
    • End Conference Report
    • Keynote Speakers
    • Rotterdam Excursions
    • Video Clips from the DIVERCITIES Conference
    • Workshops
  • Dissemination
    • Divercities Understanding super diversity in deprived and mixed neighbourhoods
    • City Books
    • City Reports
    • Divercities Educational Programme
    • Handbook for Governing Hyper-diverse Cities
    • Literature Review
    • Newsletters
    • Policy Briefs
    • Related Articles
    • Other Dissemination Activities
  • Events
    • End Conference: Governing Urban Diversity
    • Cross-Evaluation Conference
    • The Challenge of Governing Urban Diversity
    • Governing Social Diversity in Warsaw: Problems and Prospects
    • Young Divercities
  • Team
    • Advisory Board
    • Partners
    • Project Staff
    • Researchers
    • Login
  • Contact

Diversity-at-work Career Forum

February 13, 2015 Italy, Social Mobility
0
Diverse at work

The Diversity-at-work Career Forum (DCF) is an initiative aiming to improve chances and capabilities of specific disadvantaged groups in the labour market. Thus, it is an initiative targeting diversity management to favour labour participation of discriminated-against targets. In this respect, DCF can be considered as an initiative targeting social mobility, since it aims at enhancing social and economic resources and relations for some disadvantaged groups, changing their public image and promoting their social participation.

It is organised as a career day, matching supply and (discriminated) demand. It took place for the first time in 2007 in Milan. Hereafter it was repeated in other Italian cities (Rome, Naples, Padua and Catania) (Unar, 2014). DCF is organised, after several months of preparations through a dedicated website (www.diversitalavoro.it), once a year in Milan. It takes place in the city centre and has more than a city-level dimension, but the territorial distribution of events is aimed at having local ripple effects. There, firms can upload their job vacancies and candidates their curricula. Candidates’ best matching vacancies are invited for a job interview at the career day.

The partners involved in the implementation of this initiative are both from civil society and public sector: the promoter is UNAR (National Office Against Discrimination), with Sodalitas Foundation (engaged in business social responsibility), Adecco Foundation for Equal Opportunities, and People (a firm specialized in organizing career days). After the first year, when it was launched with public funds, the project became economically independent thanks to payments from participating firms. The partners in the project have an advocacy role, but also ‘gatekeep’ between target groups and the labor market.

Today, target candidates belong to three categories: foreigners, disabled, and transgender. When the initiative started, the target group only consisted of the first one; thus the initiative is gaining in scope.

Perception and use of the concept of diversity

The project explicitly addresses diversity in the three forms mentioned above (foreigners, disabled and transgender), so there is an attention for the issues related to ethnic and cultural background, physical and mental disadvantage, and to gender. This juxtaposition of diversities in a sole event may lead to some sort of attention towards hyper-diversity – even though it is not explicitly addressed nor problematized in terms of intersectionality. Also, there seems to be not so much attention on ‘labelling’ practices and the choice to put together different types of diversities.

Being the promoter of the national anti-discrimination office, the primary conceptualization of diversity is based on critical and negative dimensions of disadvantage and discrimination. Indeed, DCF focuses on problems that target groups may meet in the labour market access.

Though, the aim of DCF is to reverse this situation with positive discrimination, in order to bring out capabilities and talents of target groups, and to create job opportunities to them. In this sense, diversity may also have a positive side if properly acknowledged. Actually, the discourse underlying DCF is that diversity could be a value, once neutralised prejudice and access barriers. What is more, it may be a factor fostering economic performance.

Main factors influencing success or failure

According to the interviewed expert from UNAR, DCF has the positive effect of increasing the number of target group members in the labor market. ‘Impact’ on the labour market and ‘concreteness’ are terms used to describe the main strengths of DCF.

The impact on the labor market is measured with the number of firms and candidates taking part into the career day, and the share of candidates that find a job thanks to DCF. In 2013, selected candidates were 1000, and participating firms were 40; job interviews were 16.000.

This may be based on a specific background factor, i.e. the public-private partnership that allows the participation of a number of important business groups. The number and profile of partners ensure an effective collaboration, being the roles well defined, according to the interviewee and the document analysis.

Though, just 6% of the candidates have found a job in one of the participating firms. The share is low, but slightly increased in comparison to 2012 (+1%), and this is considered satisfactory enough by promoters. In this respect, as a factor of weakness, the involvement of firms seems more symbolic than actual. In this respect, effectiveness pertains more the public image of some diverse group and their actual labour participation. Thus, a risk of failure comes from the possible gap between targets’ expectation of labour market inclusion, and actual chances. Another factor of weakness is the low (if any) participation of small and medium-sized enterprises, which make up the largest part of Italian economy. Just large firms take part into DCF. As a consequence, one of the goals for the next editions is to increase the role of SMEs.

As an example of success, it may be considered that the inclusion of transgender population was due to claims from members of this group themselves, after the first year of activity. Thus, DCF proved to be open to different diversities and supporting empowerment of disadvantaged groups.

Furthermore, the involvement of business world may increase the attention toward business social responsibility and advantages of diversity in recruitment. This issue has been underlined with the institution of Diversity & Inclusion Awards, honouring enterprises, which recruited people via DCF.

Conclusion

This initiative is an example of a public-private network that cooperates in an integrated way. The actual impact on society at local level seems quite moderate in terms of economic performance, but potentially interesting in terms of social mobility and quite successful in acknowledging discriminated-against minorities as potentially successful economic actors. By shedding light on discrimination in the labour market, DCF increases awareness in the society at large, among economic actors and the disadvantaged groups.

—

Website: Diversity-at-work Career Forum

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
Women in Movement
Streetlife.com

Related Posts

  • divercities summary
    DIVERCITIES in Summary
    The primary mission of our project, in a nutshell, was to provide evidence of the
    February 28, 2017
  • Opsinjoren
    Opsinjoren gives neighbours who want to organise a neighbourhood activity financial and organisational support. To
    February 19, 2015
Sections
Conference News
Governance Arrangements
In The Media
News
Talking Points
Archives
  • December 2018
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
DIVERCITIES

Utrecht University
Faculty of Geosciences
P.O. Box 80.115
3508 TC Utrecht
Netherlands
Email: [email protected]

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No. 319970. SSH.2012.2.2.2-1; Governance of cohesion and diversity in urban contexts.

CASE STUDIES
Antwerp
Athens
Budapest
Copenhagen
Istanbul
Leipzig
London
Milan
Paris
Rotterdam
Tallinn
Toronto
Warsaw
Zurich
QUICK LINKS

Advisory Board
City Reports
Consortium Meetings
Educational Programme
Field Trips
Governance Arrangements
Governing Urban Diversity Conference
Literature Review
Masterclasses
Newsletters
Policy Briefs
Project Staff
Related Articles
Researchers
Ronald van Kempen
Summer School 2016
Urban Policies on Diversity clips
Workshop Themes

Subscribe to our mailing list:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
DIVERCITIES © 2019.
We use Cookies - By using this site or closing this you agree to our Cookies policy.